Probably not.

The abstract is the first thing anyone reads of a paper. And sometimes the only thing. Many people like to ask a question in their title, which they answer in the paper. This group, publishing in Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, lets you know right away that their paper is probably not worth reading. At least you know they have a sense of humor. And, hey, a negative result is worth reporting (although chemistry journals don’t seem to think so).

Can apparent superluminal neutrino speeds be explained as a quantum weak measurement?

Probably not.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s